trademark

The PayMark Battle: Whose Blue is it anyway?

PayPal instituted a Notice of Opposition in PayTM’s application under Class 36 to register its TM. PayPal is one of the world’s largest online payment services with presence in over 190 countries and the ability to transact in over 100 currencies. PayPal alleges in its notice that PayTM has misappropriated the latter’s bicolor scheme. We also have a feeling that [...]

By |2017-09-08T12:04:30+05:30March 16th, 2017|Trademark|0 Comments

Injunction in AZ Tech v Intex Technologies Ltd.

There is a temporary injunction in the case of AZ Tech (India) & Anr, v Intex technology (India) ltd. & Anr, where the handset giant, Intex technologies was injuncted from using the Aqua trademark. This injunction was granted primarily on the grounds that AZ Tech (India) was the prior user of the mark and [...]

By |2017-09-08T12:06:40+05:30March 15th, 2017|Trademark|0 Comments

A happy ending to trademark : secondshaadi.com

Wise old saying -“There is always a second chance” was followed by www.secondshaadi.com. This domain name was launched by Vivek Pahwa and others (herein referred as ‘Defendants’) on January 25, 2006. It was cater to those seeking to marry again; hence the name, making the market position of the website completely different. On the [...]

By |2017-09-08T13:04:42+05:30January 4th, 2017|India, Trademark|0 Comments

Controversy on ” Mother Dairy ” Trademark

In a recent judgment [Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable versus S.K. Raheem], Justice of the Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction in favor of Mother Dairy, restraining the use of its trademark by the defendant in its milk products sold under the name Vinay Milk. One of the key factors for Court’s conclusion [...]

By |2017-09-08T13:14:23+05:30January 2nd, 2017|Trademark, India|0 Comments

The Trademark battle over a name-Denial of Redskin’s Case

The Washington Redskins are entangled in a trademark battle over its name and is urging the Supreme Court to hear its case. The football team disagrees about the offensiveness of the name and contests the constitutionality of Section 2 (a) of the Lanham Act which bans trademarks that are “disparaging.” Under the act, the [...]

By |2017-09-08T14:31:47+05:30November 18th, 2016|Trademark|0 Comments

Trademark infringement lawsuit against Medallion food filed by Frito-Lay, Can a shape of chips be infringed?

It is a trademark infringement lawsuit against Medallion food filed by Frito-Lay for unfair competition. Frito-Lay alleged that Medallion Foods’ tortilla chips result from processes, which infringe one or more claims of United States Patent no.6610344, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents. Additionally, Frito-Lay contends that Medallion Foods is liable for infringing the [...]

By |2017-09-08T17:59:32+05:30November 18th, 2016|Trademark|0 Comments
Go to Top